To this day, I still dont understand why the NT was a failure in the US. I am sure many didnt realize that you COULD get real pannier lids and real luggage racks, like I didnt till I found this forum and did some rearsearching. But it is clear that older, mentally matured seasoned riders with above average intellegence , many of which were pilots/and or military folk, like those here on this forum, saw its worth. Honda at times has made major marketing errors, like marketing the Honda Element to college kids as a "dorm on wheels"
Who bought it? Old men with hats and dog people who appreciated it for what it really was. A utility vehicle. The NT was no commuter bike for most.* As it was advertised. It is a wonderful middleweight mid sized touring bike for one person. Maybe if it had been introduced a few decades earlier.....the C10 Connie lasted 20 years and many here have owned it....but it seems its (and the NT's) time is past...except on this board!
*No offense to Daboo. He did use the NT for a commuter bike in Sunny Seattle. In most big cities in todays makeup of traffic, I wouldnt use a motorcycle for commuting, but If I was forced to, I would have a bike I could ride more agressively, not because I want to do that, but because IMHO sudden acceleration can be a life saver at times...something the NT doesnt exactly have.